Increasing income will actually increase inflation (ceteris paribus).

Mikkel Hansen wrote :
Increasing income will actually increase inflation (ceteris paribus).

your are assuming all the increase in friendly income goes to buying players instead of stadium upgrades

Prices in general are affected by supply and demand. If managers have more money, the demand is increasing and so are prices.
I'm assuming that the extra money will go to a bit of everything :)

I think first divison should have 20 teams and 9-12th should go to conference cup. And also 3 rd of group of champions and super cup should go to super and conference cup

I think your youth players should be the nationality of your team - pave the way for international tournaments in the future.

Got my first youth player today - he's North Korean....

I agree. Although, I'd prefer some mixing, so maybe 90% from your team's country and 10% from anywhere. The latter could be biased in favor of strong footballing countries though...

I agree with nationality and I know it's been discussed before, so I hope maybe it will be considered this time.
x% league nation x% anywhere and then I would prefer a 3rd option of x% manager chosen nation.

Small suggestion regarding scouting. I think this will simply a bit the whole process and will get rid of the annoying scouting reports that disappear after a while.
1. Remove the scout from the staff
2. Own players will always have their skills visible
3. Opponent players will have their skills visible only when placed on the normal transfer market
4. For players on teamless TM you need to pay a fee to see their skills (as now)

when we start new leagues(new countries). Could we consider letting players have 2 teams to manage. Adding a second team in a new league. The new rules will eliminate cheating . So why not?? Scouting with one team and buying with the other could be an issue.

Mikkel Hansen wrote :
I agree with nationality and I know it's been discussed before, so I hope maybe it will be considered this time.
x% league nation x% anywhere and then I would prefer a 3rd option of x% manager chosen nation.

Yeah, I agree.
It's quite strange (and totally unrealistic, but ok, this is a game :) ) to have no italian players in an italian team :)
I was thinking of something like:
1. NT of the team (i.e. Italy)
2. NT of user choice (i.e. Switzerland)
and if you want to unlock other countries you have to pay a fee, to simulate a scout who persistently monitor matches in the specific nation you want to unlock.

The NT of the youth player will be randomly selected but restricted to the "unlocked NT". The fixed % inside the selection will be a user choice.
Following the previous example:
1. Italy: 70%
2. Switzerland: 5%
3. (unlocked with a fee) Germany: 25%

So the new youth will be at 70% Italian, at 25% German or 5% from Switzerland

DarthCloud wrote :

Mikkel Hansen wrote :
I agree with nationality and I know it's been discussed before, so I hope maybe it will be considered this time.
x% league nation x% anywhere and then I would prefer a 3rd option of x% manager chosen nation.

Yeah, I agree.
It's quite strange (and totally unrealistic, but ok, this is a game :) ) to have no italian players in an italian team :)
I was thinking of something like:
1. NT of the team (i.e. Italy)
2. NT of user choice (i.e. Switzerland)

Good idea to make the youth players come from the nation that the league is in by default. Or, assuming it is a league that covers a wider region (as Tegimus has hinted some new leagues might be), then youth players should by default be from countries within that region. This makes youth intake more realistic and results in a more realistic roster construction for each club in the league.

I also like the idea of giving the manager a "preferred nation" to generate youth players from. This will be important if international teams ever get added to F4F, because managers may want to generate youth for their own international teams that they are managing. The question becomes: What is the correct balance between having realistic youth intake versus where the manager wants to generate his youth players from?

In the TM, why not allow people to underbid the asking price? This would be a signal that there's an interested buyer who either doesn't have the asking price or thinks it's too high. The seller could then opt to reduce the asking price, allowing for a negotiation, in effect. It would make the TM more active and also more effective.

Totally agree with getting players of the nationality of our teams.

I'm thinking there should be a page for all time records for each club. Player stats generally like player with most goals, assists..player with most appearances.. One that is automatically updated once the records are surpassed.

GrafBelisarius wrote :
In the TM, why not allow people to underbid the asking price? This would be a signal that there's an interested buyer who either doesn't have the asking price or thinks it's too high. The seller could then opt to reduce the asking price, allowing for a negotiation, in effect. It would make the TM more active and also more effective.

Seconded

GrafBelisarius wrote :
In the TM, why not allow people to underbid the asking price? This would be a signal that there's an interested buyer who either doesn't have the asking price or thinks it's too high. The seller could then opt to reduce the asking price, allowing for a negotiation, in effect. It would make the TM more active and also more effective.

Or may be something like an enquiry on both transfer listed and non-transfer listed players. Including the max price that you are willing to pay for a player. You can argue that one can use chat for this but it is always better if you have a proper system for that

Eliminate or delete all inactive users from stats (Most successful managers/best managers etc)

Also do this to all innactive users in the game and give the real info of active players...

Cheers

On custom friendlies page could you are the division of the team offering the friendly so new teams like myself can try to select division 2 or 3 teams to avoid heavy defeats v div 1 teams.
I know the result does not matter but a closer game would surely be preferred.

I'd like to be able to join a custom tournament that begins after the one I'm in ends. Wish that was tied to round and not just a binary yes or no when it comes to being able to join other tournaments.

Mr. Ske wrote :
Hello forum,
I am manager in F4 since season 2 and here are some suggestions or ideas to make this game better:

- Increase loans up to 3 + managers should be able to cancel loan deal and there can be a % return of money per round if they did so
- We need a filter in squad where we can filter out best and worst players in all aspects/abilities/skills/price
- A lots of users considered to dark theme version of the game so, we should be able to switch between colours
- In the near future there should be an under-23 league, where the players gain EXP but less than playing in first team, if the lower tier team cannot afford or could not have u23 team, random low rating players (like bot team) is playing part for them to fill missing spots, but the team is unable to purchase those players
- Consider to put more facilities in the game such as playing ground(grass quality), hotel(home games attendance +1% or 2% per lvl but should be very expensive, research center(sth like staff training where you could spend money to increase staff efficiency), you can also add parking lots near stadium, means +% in attendance...i think that there could also be weather included in games...rain, sun, snow etc. Stadiums are allways full so consider to change that with this suggestions.

I really hope that you can check the possibilities of all suggestions, but MOST importantly, consider to get more active players in the game.
Wish you all best in 2022 feel free to contact me for anything

I writted a long time ago this....anyone agrees with changes?
Let us know